ETR-logo-Observatory_white.png

Process Automation

Microsoft Dominant in Process Automation, While Established Vendors Contend with AI-Focused Players

Share this summary
linkedin-white-100.pngX-white-100.pngfacebook-white-100.png
This report focuses on Process Automation tools, with data on the following vendors:
Appian | Automation Anywhere | Camunda | Celonis | IBM | Microsoft Power Automate | n8n | NiCE | Nintex | Pegasystems | Pipefy | Salesforce MuleSoft RPA | SAP Build Process Automation | ServiceNow | SS&C Blue Prism | Tonkean | Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax) | UiPath | WorkFusion | Zinier
Today’s robotic process automation (RPA) market encompasses business process management tools, intelligent automation platforms, and other related technologies. What began as a set of tools designed mainly to offload repetitive, manual tasks like data entry has merged with a wide array of AI and machine learning capabilities. Technologies like optical character recognition (OCR), computer vision, natural language processing (NLP), ML model training, and generative AI have all expanded what process automation can do. As a result, the boundaries between AI/ML and RPA have largely dissolved, creating both new opportunities and competitive challenges for traditional automation vendors.
The broader process automation sector now includes a range of solutions offering low-code or no-code, drag-and-drop interfaces that allow business users to assemble automation workflows without heavy engineering involvement. Vendors generally provide similar foundational features: building process steps, configuring business rules, and automating tasks with a high degree of customization. Many also highlight integrated AI features that accelerate or enhance automation. More advanced platforms include stronger governance and security controls, detailed monitoring dashboards, and prebuilt bots or workflow templates to accelerate deployment. Market leaders such as Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, and SAP Build Process Automation illustrate this category. Beyond their shared core functions, vendors tend to differentiate around industry-specific use cases, marketing messages, or particular components of the automation lifecycle.
This Observatory features comprehensive and current data about the process automation marketplace. The ETR Observatory data for Process Automation was specifically designed to capture usage and evaluation metrics across a wide swath of professionals representing the end user and evaluator buying demographic. While structuring a group of disparate vendors with varying functionalities is subjective, the ETR Observatory for Process Automation categorizes the vendor group primarily by breaking down the data-driven plotting of each vendor into our four Observatory Scope vectors and by analyzing proprietary user and evaluation metrics, including Momentum and Presence.
We’re kind of seeing ‘RPA 2.0’ with AI, where we’re using AI a lot for unstructured data, helping us make decisions in conjunction with RPA. But RPA is certainly not going away where we put it, because of the need for all kinds of data feeds where we have exclusive connections with vendors.

Microsoft Power Automate is a Stand-Out in Spending, Usage, and Stickiness

The 2025 ETR Observatory for Process Automation surveyed 316 IT decision makers. Most (69%) represent Large enterprises of more than 1,200 employees, with more than a fifth (21%) at Fortune 500 firms and nearly a third (31%) at Global 2000 enterprises. The three most representative industry verticals are Services/Consulting, IT/TelCo, and Financials/Insurance, collectively comprising more than half (55%) of the sample. More than two-thirds (69%) of respondents are in North America and 19% are in EMEA, with the remainder representing APAC (10%) and Latin American (2%) regions. About half (52%) of respondents hold VP or Director-level titles, and the remainder are split between C-level roles (28%) and practitioner roles (20%).
Positioning for the above was determined purely by ETR’s proprietary surveys powered by the ETR Community. The full methodology and graphic explanation are available on our Methodology page.
The report categorizes vendors across different categories, reflecting their Momentum and Presence within the Process Automation space:
  1. Leaders like Microsoft Power Automate, ServiceNow, SAP Build Process Automation, and UiPath show strong adoption and market share, driven by broad capabilities and ease of use.
  2. Advancing vendors Celonis and n8n are gaining Momentum but still lag in Presence compared to market leaders.
  3. Tracking vendor Salesforce MuleSoft RPA is a long-established name in enterprise tech stacks, with stronger Presence but relatively lower Momentum.
  4. Pursuing vendors, including Automation Anywhere, Appian, SS&C Blue Prism, and IBM, are experiencing slower growth, with less impact in the market.
Microsoft Power Automate and ServiceNow lead the process automation market in spending plans, with Microsoft Power Automate posting a Net Score of 72% and ServiceNow with a Net Score of 57%. Net Scores are a snapshot of positive spending plans (Adoption and Increase indications) minus negative spending plans (Replacement and Decrease indications). Both vendors have 6% Adoption rates and Increase spending indications above 50%: two-thirds (67%) of respondents are increasing spending on Microsoft Power Automate, and 57% are increasing spend on ServiceNow. Both vendors also have very low negative spending indications, with zero respondents indicating plans to Replace Microsoft Power Automate this survey. SAP Build Process Automation (40%), Celonis (40%), WorkFusion (40%), and n8n (37%) cluster behind these two leaders. Net Scores drift downward after this group, and on the lowest end are Nintex with a -19% Net Score and Pegasystems with a 6% Net Score.
Comparing Net Scores from last year’s Observatory to the present iteration, SS&C Blue Prism saw the largest increase, growing from 0% in 2024 to 21% in 2025, a gain that moves the vendor from the lowest pocket of the Pursuing vector to join the group of vendors at the top of that vector. Microsoft Power Automate was the only other vendor to see Net Score growth year-over-year, up two percentage points (ppts).

As for expected return on investment (ROI), UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Celonis, and n8n lead the process automation market. About four-fifths of respondents say they expect ROI within the first three years for UiPath (83%) and Microsoft Power Automate (82%), and about three-quarters expect ROI within the first three years for Celonis (77%) and n8n (76%). All five of these leading vendors except Microsoft Power Automate saw expected ROI grow year-over-year, too.

Microsoft Most Desired and Innovative, n8n Also Highly Recommended

As AI capabilities become more sophisticated, an open question is whether process automation vendors will incorporate these features to remain competitive with broader generative AI offerings or will be made obsolete by these technological advancements. Innovation in the process automation market may very well be synonymous with how well a process automation vendor can embrace AI and make the case for their continued use most relevant. Understanding which vendors are seen as the innovators in the market sheds light on where the market may be going in terms of its technical features, while knowing which vendors are the most desired for centering in a tech stack speaks more to deeper strategic needs for organizations as they evolve with the market. In the Observatory study, we ask respondents to provide open-ended answers to which vendor they view as the most innovative, and which vendor they could most prioritize if given the opportunity to rebuild their tech stack from scratch. Analyzing these open-ended responses shows that Microsoft Power Automate is the clear leader across both queries, by a considerable margin. After Microsoft, ServiceNow and UiPath are rates next-most desired. For most innovative, after Microsoft it’s the same two vendors swapping places: UiPath, then ServiceNow.
Among many attributes, what makes a product desired is a tool’s completeness or ability to do what is expected of it, as well as its ability to integrate with an organization’s existing technical ecosystem. Appropriately, then, Microsoft is the top vendor in the individual vendor strengths analysis for rates of agreement with the statements “this product does everything I expect a process automation tool to do” and “this product integrates easily with our existing ecosystem.” ServiceNow, Automation Anywhere, SS&C Blue Prism, and UiPath follow behind Microsoft for a tool that does everything expected of a process automation tool. UiPath, ServiceNow, Automation Anywhere, and Appian follow behind Microsoft for easy integration into existing ecosystems.

Conclusion – AI Comes for the Process Automation Sector

The process automation market is at a critical crossroads. Though the global pandemic brought financial pressures that caused organizations to look for ways to automate tasks and make work more efficient, the subsequent maturation of generative AI capabilities have forced many to view process automation tools as under threat from broader-purpose AI agents that can more or less automate the same kinds of tasks with ease. Spending data in the sectors that comprise the process automation market have shown steady decline over the past year, but a few vendors stand out for their ability to integrate AI features to make process automation better and for integration with broader cloud service provider ecosystems.
Microsoft Power Automate stands as a clear leader in many measures of this Observatory study, a natural choice for organizations with Azure and M365 ecosystems but also seen as an undisputed leader in the field. But aside from Microsoft, a broader tranche of vendor names are jockeying for prominence in the space. Some, like Salesforce MuleSoft RPA, SAP Build Process Automation, and UiPath, are established process automation players that have proven their stickiness in tech stacks and ROI. Others, like n8n most notably, have inserted themselves into the larger conversation of process automation leaders on many fronts, doubling-down on AI-centered features and workflows that have made the vendor more appealing in today’s AI age. The process automation sector will no doubt look very different a year from now than it does today, as market share will shift toward vendors that can capitalize on AI momentum rather than be displaced by it.
To dive deeper into the ETR Observatory's insights and uncover the full competitive landscape, use the form below to check out the full report.
contact us
Press Need a quote, image, or additional information for an article, reach out to our press team at press@etr.ai
Reprints If you would like permission to reprint this report or our ETR Observatory Scope graphic, please send your request to reprints@etr.ai
ETR Insights Team Contact a member of our ETR Insights team to discuss all the details from this analysis or request custom research.
  • Erik Bradley, Chief Strategist & Research Director epb@etr.ai
  • Daren Brabham, PhD, VP Research Analyst dbrabham@etr.ai
  • Jake Fabrizio, Principal Research Analyst jf@etr.ai
  • Doug Bruehl, Principal Research Analyst dbruehl@etr.ai
Back to Summary | About ETR | Key Terms | Methodology